ugh i skipped A too quickly

I was confused by A at first because I assumed when they say the doctors have "the cause to use" means they are motivated （by the D producers) to prescribe D to their patients instead of reading it literally as doctors using D themselves. So I should probably stop making assumptions about the options but rather choose the more obvious flaw.

#help

Please tell me my explanation for D is correct :)

Arjun disagrees with Yolanda on whether Joyriding is more dangerous than gaining access to computers without authorization using the example of stealing medical records systems. From that example, Arjun concludes that because hacking to hospital computers can also cause physical harm, it is as dangerous as joyriding.

I chose B over D because I thought Arjun did not mention joyriding thus he did not disagree with Yolanda on anything explicitly related to joyriding but only that computer crimes can cause physical harm.

Interested!!!

#help

#11 For C, isn't it mentioned in the part where the psychological research suggests that "people who reveal information that appears to be aginst their own best interest are likely to be perceived as more credible and thus may be more persuasive", which would be achieved if the lawyer performing the "stealing thunder" strategy have their clients testify in person and admit their past mistakes, thus increase the credibility for their further arguments?

#12 For B, I dont understand why he says it has nothing to do with the last sentence of the passage. Isn't having certain attitudes and biases the same as filter subsequent information through the schema--the biased cognitive framework)?

#help Does "a statement that the argument is intended to support" always equal conclusion? Can it mean sub-conclusion?

#help

Doesn't E assume that "a great amount of time" spent on organizing = inefficient/not more efficient?

I understand why the other choices are wrong but the reason why E is right doesn't quite convince me....

This weakening question got me cause I read it too fast and pretty much skipped the first line, which turned out to be the point of this question. Somehow I assume the weakening option would be found in the details of the experiment and neglect what is the most important thing....

This question gives me a walking on ice feeling...everytime i think there are traps ahead, i ended up in the trap :)

I understand it might be more time-consuming if I take the negative of the options and find the one without which the conclusion doesn't stand, I feel more certain about the answer choices and won't wandering around the baits... which are often options for SA or Strengthening questions.

Note: For RRE questions, explicit answers without further assumptions are the go-to choice.

#help Why is B wrong? My understanding of the missing link btw the principle and the application is that the student needs to KNOWINGLY present to commit plagiarism. In that case, if B is correct and the student did not attribute because he did not realize/know that the two are identical.

Am I making assumptions that realize=know?

I love how i failed 7 even knowing what preponderance means and got to see so many roasts here. Thanks everyone for making my day