For B, its a total assumption that the proposal is "bound to" deter some people from climbing. IMO B does not strengthen at all.

congrats girl!!!!

its on the eastern side of eurasia btw (not the western)

this is stupid i hate this

This might be something only someone with little knowledge about space would bring up... but are the chances a planetary system will CONTAIN large comets even relevant? isnt it just as likely that a large comet can just swoop through open space and hit another planet, even if that comet dosnt belong in that planetary system?? this is why i didnt pick D but I might be being stupid.

jk actually only C, B does not lend as much support.

as an econ major, this question is bs and A does not lend any more support to the argument than do B and C

D could be right?? Like the link between sensitivity to temperature and surface area exists and u dont need to study physics to know that??? i dont understand why we are pretending we know nothing about the physical world.

ok i dont see how any other answer could work but i just dont think that B is a good answer to the question in any way, and I might be alone in thinking this. To me, a worldview is BY DEFINITION an interpretation of reality.... like thats literally what it means. so i dont understand why it takes an "assumption" to bridge the gap... i dont think there is a gap.

So when you say "Just because they express their own worldviews through photographs doesn’t mean that they are interpretations of reality;" .... i disagree. like that is literally what that means....

agreed. it seems pretty straight forward to me.