Can someone please help explain why D is the right answer and the rest are wrong based on the lessons on MBT question types.
#help
Admin note: edited title
Does a Not Both relationship translate to A -> /B?
then why is the relationship for inclusive both being used?
Thank you so much for the amazing explanation!
Can someone please help explain why D is the right answer and the rest are wrong based on the lessons on MBT question types.
#help
Admin note: edited title
25 years ago the price that an individual paid for a new car was lesser than the price an individual would have to pay now. The stimulus compares four values: Price of car 25 years ago, average income 25 years ago, price of car now, average income now. Over the years in relation to ones average income, the price one pays for the car has increased. The assumption being made here is that the number of people who bought the cars is roughly the same.
Answer choice E attacks this assumption
So if an answer choice attacks the premise or the conclusion then it can weaken the argument? Because in the previous lessons, it was mentioned that answer choices that attack premises or conclusions should not be chosen in weaken question types. Rather, the answer choices that break the logical support between P and C should be chosen instead.
#help
If I don't go forward with a certain school after applying to it or don't pursue with their application, does it hurt to apply to the same school again for next year? Will they still offer scholarship if I get same or higher marks on LSAT since I had not pursued with their application and waited to apply in the next cycle?
Can someone who has experience with admissions reply!
I appreciate your help in this!
Thanks
#help
Can someone please explain how does the first conditional statement is made from the premise. It seems to have all and requires as keywords for sufficient and necessary terms.
Thanks