I understand that answer choice B is wrong because it says "conclusion that is clearly false" but I had thought that the explanation of monogamous relationships was analogous to the explanation of altruism in the other passage. I thought that passage B was providing a another phenomenon explained by evolutionary psychology to undermine the argument in passage A by showing it doesn't make sense to use the proliferation of genes as an explanation in that analogous case. If I was doing the question, I would have eliminated based off of "conclusion that is clearly false" because it doesn't say if it's true or false (or right or wrong as said in the passage). I just don't see how these two concepts wouldn't be analogous as was said in the explanation.

At 2:08 the audio echos suddenly and I just wanted to make sure that my computer isn't broken. That being said I loved it.

Just wondering if we are doing these new RC lessons and we haven't done the old ones, should we? I wonder if there's any benefit to also doing the old RC section?