Kevin's note that we shouldn't be too concerned with speed yet was on point. I was just stressing that I took too long for the previous section's drills.
Wouldn't the main point be more like "Stealing Thunder is effective, but it has some limitations?" Why aren't we including the bottom limitation point?
Just wondering if we are doing these new RC lessons and we haven't done the old ones, should we? I wonder if there's any benefit to also doing the old RC section?
How is a single position passage different from spotlight passage? Can't you use the spotlight framework to understand this passage? Let me tell you about this thing (stealing thunder). Here's why it's works (reasons 1,2,3,4).
#feedback this seems to be the written explanation of paragraph 3 we did in the last lesson, not the after-passage explanation :)
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
17 comments
Kevin's note that we shouldn't be too concerned with speed yet was on point. I was just stressing that I took too long for the previous section's drills.
Does the lack of citations bother anyone else?
funny how this passage used the concept of stealing thunder by providing negative information in the last paragraph.
So is this the SP framework "Here's some background of X, here's what I think, and why?"
Where:
Background = lawyers believe stealing thunder is effective
What (I) Author thinks = the effectiveness of stealing thunder is supported
Why = Psych Explanations 1-4
#feedback
Wouldn't the main point be more like "Stealing Thunder is effective, but it has some limitations?" Why aren't we including the bottom limitation point?
GO KEVIN.. WHOOP WHOOP
I was typing up my question about timing right as you got to answering it! Thank you for reading my mind haha!
Just wondering if we are doing these new RC lessons and we haven't done the old ones, should we? I wonder if there's any benefit to also doing the old RC section?
How is a single position passage different from spotlight passage? Can't you use the spotlight framework to understand this passage? Let me tell you about this thing (stealing thunder). Here's why it's works (reasons 1,2,3,4).
#feedback this seems to be the written explanation of paragraph 3 we did in the last lesson, not the after-passage explanation :)