Just because you haven't proved A or B independently does not mean you haven't narrowed it down to only two candidates (A B)

The author assumes that all coins were dropped there no earlier than 375AD

slight productivity is not worth the painstaking effort

This one ask you to justify why undercover allows to drink but normally they cannot. So the best explanation would be if they don't drink people will get suspicious, and that might lead to hurting the undercover purpose

Why they cannot be taxed as toys? Because gov collects tax based on the how the product is marketed

5 companies make up 60% total suggest one of the five releases more than most? Not necessarily. It might be the case that the other four of five make up almost 60%

This one assumes that G causes cancer but it could be possible that cancer causes G

This one asks you what they both AGREE on, Jake said antibacterial product kills bacteria so people should use it. K said bacteria that survive will produce resistant so don't use. So that suggest they both agree that antibacterial product DOES kill some bacteria.

Count me in!! zee.brad@.com