PT139.S1.Q6 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 2 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20

PASSAGE 4

Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 4 · lr

Despite the company’s arguments, their figurines were not classified as toys and thus were not given lower tariffs. Why? The company marketed the figurines as collectibles rather than toys.

The government agency’s argument is pretty straightforward—you’ve been marketing your product as collectibles, so you can’t suddenly call them toys—but this is still an assumption they’re making. As such, we want a rule that clearly articulates it:

Products should be classified however they are marketed.

(A) justifies the agency’s reasoning. If the company is marketing their figurines as collectibles, they should be classified as collectibles and thus not given the lower tariffs of toys.

(B) leads to the wrong conclusion. We’re trying to prove the figurines should not be classified as toys, not that the company making them should try to classify them as toys for tariff purposes.

Wrong trigger. We know the figurines amuse customers like toys, but we don’t know if this means they are used like toys. As such, we can’t use this rule.

Wrong trigger and wrong conclusion. We know that the figurines cause amusement, but we don’t know if they were developed for that purpose. As such, we can’t use this rule. We are also trying to prove that the objects should not get the lower tariffs by being classified as toys, not that they should.

Wrong trigger and wrong conclusion. We have no clue how different types of marketing would affect the prices of the figurines. We’re also trying to prove that the figurines should be classified as collectibles, not dictate how the company should market them.

PrepTest 139 - Section 1 - Question 6

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action