Subscription pricing
I just noticed that Berkeley claims to have had 6,039 Fall 2018 applicants, and they claim to have accepted 314 of them. This seems like it would result in a roughly 5% acceptance rate, rather than the 20% listed on the predictor page. Can anyone explain this apparent disparity? Does this mean they actually accepted around 1,200 applicants and 900 didn't accept their offers of admission?
I'm confused. Am I misunderstanding the government's reply? I thought that the government was claiming that no evidence could exist that would exonerate (or even support) the defendant. If this is true, wouldn't it mean that they couldn't have destroyed evidence that couldn't exist? #help
Or should I read the reply to mean that there is currently no evidence that would support the defendant, which could be true if they had already destroyed it?