@TheMikey I actually don't think your interpretation was incorrect. If I take the LSAT, then I'll score a 180, which cannot happen without studying hard. A -> B -> C perfect. I really think it just all depends on how we read it, and apparently you and I we were reading it differently that's all
@"Heart Shaped Box" said: @TheMikey I actually don't think your interpretation was incorrect. If I take the LSAT, then I'll score a 180, which cannot happen without studying hard. A -> B -> C perfect. I really think it just all depends on how we read it, and apparently you can I we were reading it differently that's all
Comments
I believe it's the latter: (A -> B ) -> C
"Which" is referring to this whole conditional (A -> B ) in order to this to happen, we need C.
deleted
never mind, heart is right. I misread it and thought you wrote B cannot happen without C.
heart is right, it's (A-->B) --> C
@TheMikey I actually don't think your interpretation was incorrect. If I take the LSAT, then I'll score a 180, which cannot happen without studying hard. A -> B -> C perfect. I really think it just all depends on how we read it, and apparently you and I we were reading it differently that's all
yeah, you're probably right :P