I just used the "num expected" in the analytics section if you want more precise numbers, but it looks like between 9-12 assumption types would be expected
@kimmy_m66 said:
I just used the "num expected" in the analytics section if you want more precise numbers, but it looks like between 9-12 assumption types would be expected
If you think about it, most argument questions are really assumption questions at their core. For the most part, strengthen and weaken questions require you to identify an assumption (read: gap) in the argument and find an answer choice that exploits that assumption in a specific way. Same goes for Justify the Principle questions. And Flaws are just really bad assumptions. This is the paradigm that Manhattan LR preaches.
Comments
I just used the "num expected" in the analytics section if you want more precise numbers, but it looks like between 9-12 assumption types would be expected
Gah *must get better at assumption questions *
A LOT
I remember thinking that on the Septembe 2017 and December 2017 exams - it felt like there were assumptions everywhere!
this makes me want to cry; it's by far my achilles heel in LR and I was hoping maybe there were only a couple.
If you think about it, most argument questions are really assumption questions at their core. For the most part, strengthen and weaken questions require you to identify an assumption (read: gap) in the argument and find an answer choice that exploits that assumption in a specific way. Same goes for Justify the Principle questions. And Flaws are just really bad assumptions. This is the paradigm that Manhattan LR preaches.