Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 32.2K All Categories
- 27.2K LSAT
- 16.5K General
- 5.1K Logical Reasoning
- 1.3K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 72 Podcasts
- 193 Webinars
- 9 Scholarships
- 193 Test Center Reviews
- 2K Study Groups
- 108 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.4K Specific LSAT Dates
- 13 June 2024 LSAT
- 3 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 23 January 2024 LSAT
- 37 November 2023 LSAT
- 41 October 2023 LSAT
- 12 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 2 August 2024 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 4.8K Not LSAT
- 3.9K Law School Admissions
- 11 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 581 Technical Problems
- 276 Off-topic
PT32.S1.Q11 - Many of the presidents and prime ministers
wortham168
Free Trial Member
Hi! I'm practicing Must Be True/Most Supported questions and am having trouble with understanding why B is the correct answer as opposed to D. Answer D seems more like a paraphrase which is why I thought it's correct. Would love an explanation. Thanks!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-32-section-1-question-11/
Admin note: edited title and link
Comments
I think you are making sufficiency/necessity confusion. (D) is not a paraphrase of the stimulus.
What does the second sentence say? It basically says: Anyone with A, B, and C can do something.
Are A, B, and C each necessary to do something? No. A, B, and C together are sufficient conditions for something but not necessary.
I don't know what curriculm you are using, but I highly recommend enrolling in 7Sage to understand the logic behind sufficiency and necessity.