It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Erased because of forum rule of not posting info direct from PT's.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-3-question-16/
Admin note: edited title and added link
Comments
"Without" signifies necessary condition and negates the sufficient condition. So Premise 1 should be translated as "MEC -> T" ("without trust there cannot be meaningful emotional connection to another human being").
With the corrected premise, the argument would look something like this:
P1: MEC -> T
P2: ~I -> MEC
C: H -> T
The missing premise would be "H -> ~I," whose contrapositive is answer choice (A).
There's a forum rule against posting direct quotes from PTs, by the way.
Thank you for clearing it up for me, and my mistake on the post.