Question about a questions i just did Flawed MOR

JimminyCricket

Hey guys so I was doing question 4, LR2 preptest 25.

In this question the premise was

a->b->c

and then it concluded c->a

So the correct FMOR answer was

"the argument ignore the facto that some c's may not appreciate a's.

so c -some- a/

Is this a rule that can be applied to all conditional logic? A->B always can also mean B -some- A/?

A bit confused thanks. Hope this all made sense.

vanlsatstu

post the question, it is hard to follow what you are talking about.

swnam90

no, A-> B doesn't imply "B some not A", but it may. In other words, It might turn out that A->B and, simultaneously, that B->A, which means that "B some not A" doesn't follow. But it also might turn out that B is a circle in which A is just a subset of B, which would mean that There are some B's that are not As. Do you get it?

inactive

@vanlsatstu It's against 7Sage's rules to post entire questions!
Forum Rules