It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
So I understand and see how valid arguments relate to LSAT questions, but can someone explain how I would apply invalid arguments into LSAT questions. What type of question would invalid arguments be useful for, I understand they are important to know, but how can I apply them.
Comments
Invalid arguments are useful for parallel flaws Questions. But there are also useful in eliminating answer choices in MBT, Sufficient Assumption, Pseudo Assumption, and Principle. Knowing when something triggers and doesn't in logic games is also a timesaver.
Also MSS—wrong answer choices will lean on this. Even flaw answers that rely on sufficient/necessary confusions.