This is from two years ago, but I'm sure future people with have the question. I was confused about it myself until I had time with it. It's actually a fairly easy conditional logic problem. A -> B and B ->C then A->C.
(A) If a country is to remain a leading nation then (B) the need is undeniable. Need refers to the need for better understanding of international affairs by the citizenry.
(B) If there is a need (and remember the need is undeniable) then (C) all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subject matter with an international orientation.
Therefore, (A) if the country is to remain a leading nation then (C) all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subject matter with an international orientation.
That is the logical deduction from the two sentences in the premise and it is also the first answer choice. Answer A.
Comments
bump
I was also struggling with this question and came across this discussion- I think it is the same one you are asking.
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/18190
This is from two years ago, but I'm sure future people with have the question. I was confused about it myself until I had time with it. It's actually a fairly easy conditional logic problem. A -> B and B ->C then A->C.
(A) If a country is to remain a leading nation then (B) the need is undeniable. Need refers to the need for better understanding of international affairs by the citizenry.
(B) If there is a need (and remember the need is undeniable) then (C) all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subject matter with an international orientation.
Therefore, (A) if the country is to remain a leading nation then (C) all of our new teachers must be prepared to teach their subject matter with an international orientation.
That is the logical deduction from the two sentences in the premise and it is also the first answer choice. Answer A.