Hey guys,
I'm planning to apply for law school this coming fall and would like to attend the fall of 2016. I had been planning on taking the lsat this June, and I've been studying since about October of 2014. Though it's been about 6 months, it hasn't really been intensive studying, just fitting it in with college and work, here and there, etc. I can do some intensive studying beginning in May for a little less than a month right before the test and I'm wondering whether I should just take it in June and then take it again in October, or wait until October. I feel like I'd do better in October after having the entire summer to really study but if I don't take the June test, October will be the first and last time I'll be able to take it (and still be able to apply on time). Any advice would be appreciated
Comments
@dhernan01 and @fifthending The policy does vary from school to school but it is fairly typical that schools will take your highest score. Not even Yale explicitly states that they will average scores.
Also, while I do think the advice that "law school will always be here" is sage, I do wonder why with 6.5 weeks left, you're already asking yourself this question. Depending on where you are and where you want to get, 6.5 weeks of intense studying can get you to where you want to go. If you truly believe that the extra months in the summer are going to be beneficial, than by all means take it.
If there's actually an additional reason (scared to take the exam, fear of failure, berating yourself for not studying harder in the past, etc.), I think you should reconsider your desire to postpone. I've postponed the test since October 2013 -- that's right, not 2014, 2013, which means I've been "studying" for the past 2 years -- except that I wasn't studying nearly as intense as I should have been. Instead, I kept postponing it thinking that all the anxieties I felt towards the exam would just magically dissipate and that during the summer I could just go from being a chronic procrastinator to studying 8 hours a day. Lo and behold, it didn't actually work like that (for me). So I kept on postponing, waiting for that magical "get your stuff together woman!" to hit, not giving it my all, with the security that I could postpone whenever. June for me is a hard deadline. If I get the inkling that I want to postpone to October, it's because I know that I feel guilty for not studying as much as I need to be, not because I can't actually accomplish my goals within the next month and a half.
YOU CAN DO IT OP :]
So given that they take the average of your scores, that makes me a little less inclined to take it in June. I haven't gotten through all the material yet (I haven't even gotten to taking all the preptests yet) but my score when I took the practice test cold before 7sage was 150...I don't know if that matters. I just don't want October to be my last and only opportunity to take it...what if something goes wrong? But thanks for all the input guys, I'll give it a bit more thought
Just saying. Caution is warranted.
http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/near-complete-201415-cycle-data/
Spivey just released another update on this cycle and the reoccuring theme is that 170+ scorers are way down. Top schools with large class sizes like Harvard, NYU, Columbia (350+ppl) can't afford to be key word *as* picky compared to 5 years ago.
This is just one man's opinion from following TLS where there are a lot of T14 0L gunners as well as current students.
However, applying early will not compensate for a subpar lsat score. If you think waiting until October will be the difference from a 165 to a 169-171, then I think you should wait. If you're in the 168-170 range now, haul ass and take it.
Oh, and in terms of NYU, even though they claim to average multiple scores on their website, it is buyer's market, so I highly doubt that NYU, or any school for that matter will turn down a stellar lsat score. For example, suppose one scores a 155 the first time around, but scores a 172 on a retake. The average would be a 163.5; however, do you really think they would view it as a 163 when they will have to report it to the ABA as a 172? My educated guess is that it's highly unlikely. Take the test when you are good and ready.
*(Assuming there could be such a prize and that I would be the most appropriate person to award it ... one of those assumptions is false and the other is highly, highly dubious)
Seriously though, I heartily agree with the critique of the "retake" mindset.