When did you show most improvement on PT's?

sarahblair · January 2021

Hi everyone!
I'm currently in the beginning of the course, and I am just curious if you guys showed a large improvement between your diagnostic PT and the first few PT's you took once finishing all the prep lessons offered? Or did most people just show gradual improvement as you took the PT's?
Thanks!

173orbust · January 2021

I did not take a PT before the curriculum but I have gradually improved after the course. My first PT after the core curriculum was a 167 and I have recently scored as high as a 180 with a PT average of 175 over my last 5 PTs. The course teaches you the fundamentals but you will certainly improve with practice as you take more PTs.

sarahblair · January 2021

@173orbust that's great! Thank you for the response.

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

Related Discussions

When did you show most improvement on PT's?

When do you know when it's time to move on?Having some trouble identifying when I should move on from a question. My current pace is not getting to around 2 problems per section. I am looking …

When you do full-length PT, do you keep track of RC timing (passage/Q's)? If so, how?When you guys practice doing full length PT's under test taking conditions, for RC, do you guys keep track of how long it takes you read each passage…

For RC, when you skip/circle a question, come back when finish Q's for passage or when done section?For RC, when you skip/circle a question, do you come back to that skipped/circled question once you finish all the 7 or 8 questions in that section, …

When did you all start taking PT's say once or twice a week?I have been studying for about three weeks now and feel like it is still slightly ineffective to take a PT each week this early and would benefit mor…

Improving on PowerScore's "Double Not Arrow"--See Quinn's Improved Improvement in the CommentsThe "/A->B" rule is so important for grouping games that PowerScore uses a special symbol ("A<-|->B", or "the double-not arrow") to note it. As a per…

Comments