PTC2.S2.Q17: Is LSAC trolling me or am I just tripping?

Ashley2018Ashley2018 Monthly Member
edited October 20 in Logical Reasoning 1855 karma

So I was utterly confused after reading the first sentence. I just didn't get how they were able to use the color of gazelle teeth to tell whether a group of humans were nomadic or not. I just don't understand how this "support" supports the conclusion that N was nomadic but C were not. How would the color of gazelle teeth tell you anything about human lifestyle?

What are you even supposed to do after reading an argument like this and being utterly confused? I can skip but that just delays the inevitable. I have to come back it. How do you talk yourself out of confusion?

Admin Note: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-c2-section-2-question-17/

Sign In or Register to comment.