It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Hi 7Sagers. I'm taking my first attempt in February and I was curious how people handled different instances of things going wrong during the test: things like misreading or missing a rule during a logic game, not having enough time to get to all your LR questions, not understanding an RC passage well, etc?
I'm trying to make a plan for how I would handle things if they go wrong in order to decrease my anxiety so any help would be greatly appreciated!
Comments
The only way to be appropriately weaponed for this is to simulate your PTs under conditions as close as possible to the real exam.
At least I can tell from my experience that the anxiety will always be higher during the real exam, as there will always be in the back of your mind that this is not a PT, but the real thing. Therefore, it is extremely crucial to be able to handle such moments, and the only way to train your brain to do this is by repeatedly making the decisions you have to make in such moments in your PTs.
I think a "plan" would be too long to write down here, since the list of potential "fuck-ups" is simply too long, though I can share for instance in what moments during my last exam in January I felt that training my brain for those really paid off:
I got stuck during the second logic game. I skipped three questions without spending too much time on thinking/worrying about them. Finished game 3 and 4, and had 5 or 6 minutes left. Came back, and saw that I had forgotten about a rule of that game. Solved all 3 questions with sufficient time to double-check my answers on those, and had 1 min left at the end.
I did not have to blind-guess a single question during LR and RC this time. This was not the case at the October exam, where I blind-guessed 1-2 questions on each LR section due to time running out (I completely messed up RC back then). This was the case simply because I actively trained that situation so many times that my brain was hard-wired to function by the following algorithm, in case I do not know an answer:
a) Re-read stem
b) Re-read stim
c) Re-read all AC
d) Lower your standards
e) Identify assumptions and compare leap
f) Compare subject-verb-object, if applicable
g) Read for precise meaning
i) If not sure after some time (1.5 min for LR, 1 min for RC), flag, pick your best guess and move on.
Lastly, keep in mind the following: