http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-2-question-20/Hello guys, this MBT question actually comes from the MBT course video. Most people have the question about the last sentence "even its critics acknowledge." I have read all the replies in order to understand why there is tremendous public support, but I still don't understand. When JY explains this sentence, he dropped a period before "for the project", I don't know whether he indicated that "for the project" is not a modifier of "would be not tremendous public support", but rather of "even its critics acknowledge". Could someone kindly explain this? The grammar here is really hard.
Comments
Now, if we diagrammed the last sentence up until the "that even its critics..." It would look something like this:
CR-->/PS
That is, "if the critics are right, then there would not be public support"
Taking the contrapositive of this gives us
"PS-->/CR"
And we are in luck! Because the stimulus told us that there is in fact public support! So it must be true that the critics are not right in their idea about what must be true for a project to be justified. They initially said that a project is justified only if benefits could be shown, so if we now know this is incorrect, it must be true that a project can be justified even if there is no public benefit shown, which is what E tells us!
Hope this helps! If you are still unsure about the grammar lemme know!
If there were no public support then the critics wouldn't be "acknowledging" this fact, they would be using it as evidence that they are correct! But they have no choice but o acknowledge the support even though it goes against what they believe.
Another way of reading this is by just adding "there is" to the end of the last sentence. And if you read the stimulus as a whole rather than just parsing individual words, the author is implicitly arguing against the critics position. That's the way their argument is structured.
Finally, what is the verb acknowledging referring to? The word "the" preceding public support indicates that it is in fact public support it is referring to. There is nothing in the argument that says "no public support"; the argument says "then there would not be THE public support THAT even its critics acknowledge." The word "even" is indicative here also... It is being used as an adverb to emphasize the occurrence of the fact that critics are acknowledging that support exists. Why are they using even? Because the critics have all the reason to ignore the support or act like it doesn't exist, yet EVEN THEY are acknowledging (i.e. conceding the fact) that it exists.