It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
In lesson 2 of Assumption and Weakening questions, J.Y. stated, "Bear in mind that most arguments in real life and on the LSAT do not have a valid relationship." A deeper explanation at this early stage will be very helpful to me. I am particularly interested in the "real-life" side of this argument, but also what this means for the LSAT as I work through this section.
Can someone provide a deeper explanation of this statement?
Admin note: https://7sage.com/lesson/good-v-bad-arguments/?ss_completed_lesson=1003