It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Free will is not applicable in determining responsibility for all situations (its not a one size fit all equation).
We hold criminals responsible bc they cause damage out of free will.
We do not hold drivers (driving while heart attack and cause damage) responsible, even though the heart attack could be prevented from diet (free will).
A. Itself is not a conclusion
BC. Not “Should”
D. Not true
E. Maybe, saying that we do not apply free will equally to all situations (i.e both criminals and drivers under heart attack both stem from free will but they have different outcome).