Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 33.4K All Categories
- 28K LSAT
- 17K General
- 5.2K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 70 Podcasts
- 193 Webinars
- 12 Scholarships
- 194 Test Center Reviews
- 2.1K Study Groups
- 111 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.5K Specific LSAT Dates
- 25 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 9 September 2024 LSAT
- 38 August 2024 LSAT
- 28 June 2024 LSAT
- 4 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 22 January 2024 LSAT
- 37 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5K Not LSAT
- 4K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 635 Technical Problems
- 285 Off-topic
PT135.S1.Q25- Help
NelHPdrs
Core Member
I am having trouble with the lawgic. My take away was:
WD m→ feature art
/comfortable→/WD
comfortable→SI
My thoughts for chaining...
contrapose comfortable→SI to become /SI→/comfortable
Therefore the chain...
/SI→/comfortable→/WD
So if /WD then... /WD m→/feature art
Can someone please explain why this is incorrect?
I appreciate the help!
Admin Note: Edited title. For LR questions, please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."
Comments
im free rn if you want to go over it my discord is hiloiland
You can't get the contrapositive of a most statement. The statement reads WD m--> FA. That's how it has to be read. /WD draws no conclusions anyway, it's the sufficient.