PT47 S1 Q24

babybenny

I don't understand why A can't be an answer and C is right.

The stimulus said "Instruction is available-> consumers would find it much easier to put together" and I should find out the situation which cannot always meet the principle.
I thought if it went like this Instruction is available-> consumers would "NOT" find it much easier to put together, so that's why I picked A.

But the answer is C. It's like Instruction is NOT available-> consumers would find it much easier to put together, right?
So how can C be an answer?
I mean when we find something against principles, shouldn't we find A-> NOT B (if the stimulus says A->B)?
So that's why I thought A is an answer because it's just like A->Not B (But C is "NOT A->B")

Can anyone explain why C is an answer and A is wrong?
Thanks!

nye8870

It almost seems like this is a weakening question and ac-C is the only one that remotely (and I mean remotely) does this. I am curious to see what others have to say too. It appears to me C is saying, "Look barely anybody even uses the instructions, so why bother changing them in such a way?"

nye8870

ac-A actually helps the argument by saying there is in fact a group of people out there assembling the product who are experiencing problems using the current style of written directions. Therefore ---> change the way they are written.