Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

How to tell the difference between just argument and causation weakening questions

ewinters0329ewinters0329 Member
in General 5 karma
Could someone clarify the best way to tell the difference between weakening questions where the argument is a simple argument and where the argument involves causation? Is it that the causation argument involves a change in a phenomenon? Does this always hold true? I guess anyway that in each instance, you are still attacking the "support," as providing an alternative explanation for a causation is not attacking the hypothesis or phenomenon, but it would still be helpful to know when to pull out my causation logic skills.

Comments

  • Jonathan WangJonathan Wang Yearly Sage
    6866 karma
    Arguments involving causation are a subset of arguments generally. You weaken every argument the same way - by attacking the support relationship - so that's what you do with causation arguments too. Your question is sort of like asking how you can tell the difference between an apple and a fruit.

    As for how to identify them - this is possibly an instance of jargon getting in the way of your thinking. Causation is exactly what it sounds like - it refers to "A causes/caused B" type of thinking. Is the author saying that A causes/caused B? If so, you whip out causation logic. No? Leave it at home.
Sign In or Register to comment.