The correct answer here made zero sense to me.
In answer B, he says she says "Hey, recycled paper isn't necessarily lower quality. In fact, the best paper was made was made from recycled materials..."
How is that irrelevant?
Frankly, all the answer choices seemed a bit zany in this one.
Comments
Sorry pal, but you're not telling me anything that makes me want to buy YOUR contemporary recycled paper!
The other answers are very out there, with maybe the exception of E, which could be eliminated because he does recognize the manager's concern for quality, but doesn't address it with facts that are relevant to the manager's concern about quality differences between today's recycled and wood made paper.
I'm going to try an analogous argument:
Me: I don't want to buy a German car because I don't think they are as reliable as Japanese ones and I need a car that lasts 15 years.
VW dealer: But German cars are not necessarily worse. [My support for this opinion is that] From the 1800 the Germans were known to make the finest engines in the world, and the Japanese only started making them when the German manufacturers couldn't keep up with demand.
Me: So? It's easy to be the best when you're the only one. Maybe the Japanese are very fast learners and while you guys were resting on your laurels they quickly surpassed you. I need some hard proof that your VW is going to last as long as a Toyota, or I'm out of here.
OKay. That makes a bunch more sense.
Thank you!