What are some of the strategies and techniques you all use to reach a perfect 180 on BR? What is a typical range for questions circled for further review? What do you do with questions you didn't circle but actually missed? What for questions you missed after a BR? What are some of the best ways to collect previous missed questions for future review?
Below are some of the strategies I've used. I haven't scored a perfect one 180 on BR, however, so others' tips would be much appreciated!
- Chronicling the reasons behind my wrong answer choices, tallying the number of times this happens, and recording the PT number on which a respective mistake was made.
- This may seem like an obvious one but wasn't a strategy I adopted until later - I examine my relative strength in each question type (especially for LR) for my five most recent PTs. From there, I review the core curriculum for the question type at issue, review previous missed questions of that type, and drill specifically on that question type.
- Coming into each PT with full awareness of what I am weak at and possibly reviewing these areas beforehand. This way, I am prepared to avoid the many past traps in which I have customarily fallen.
Comments
1) Know why the wrong answer choices are wrong, and what makes the correct one correct. And by knowing why, I don't mean "Because LSAC said so." Be able to explain to someone who has no understanding of the LSAT why a correct AC is correct, and why an incorrect one is incorrect.
2) Don't fight with the LSAT writers. If they say it's a wrong AC, then it's a wrong AC. Focus your time on understanding the question, the answer choices, and what they mean. I've noticed that many people who argue that the test writers made an error more often than not misunderstood the AC or stimulus.
3) Know your weaknesses, and address them. I had trouble with this. I hated LG and RC...still do. So, I took the path of least resistance and studied LR. 3 months later, this bit me in the butt. We're not talking a little chihuahua-type bite...think: hungry pit bull.
4) Don't give up. BRing in the 160s doesn't mean that you'll never learn or master the LSAT. It just means that you haven't, YET.
I think at a certain point in your prep, some questions will elude your understanding. Once you're above 20 PTs with quality BR, you should expect to push your BR scores higher (I think this amount of exposure to questions usually corresponds with greater understanding of the task at hand).
I also think my BR has suffered because of my unfamiliarity with the newest tests. Even PT 69, which many of us reviewed last night, had a few questions that I immediately recognized as questions incorporating new(ish) ideas. Regardless, I'm setting myself up to fail if I can't review the majority of the test due to not circling questions.
And I write out my explanations on paper. In pencil of course!