PT 41.S2.G3 - each of the seven members

cacrv567

I'm reviewing why I struggled more than I should've on game 3, and JY labeled the in/out differently than I did. He labels "finance" as out and "incentives" as in. I switched mine around and while I was still able to solve the game, I struggled more than I should've have on this simple in/out game. If you linked up the conditional chains with "finance" as in and "incentives" as out, I don't think you get the correct split boards. Has anyone tried this game with the same labels as me? Trying to figure out if I made a logic mistake or if I'm missing something in this game (whyyyyy).
Thanks in advance!!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-2-game-3/

cacrv567

NVM it's all the same because logic.