Parallel vs. Parallel Flaw

ThePaperChase

When the question asks: "which exhibits a pattern of reasoning most closely similar?" indicating a Parallel question, is it implicitly given to us that the stimulus contains a valid argument? Or can we not assume that? Just wanted to make sure because I think that would help me eliminate answer choices (that contain invalid arguments) quicker.

This is in contrast to Parallel Flaw, which explicitly states "which exhibits a pattern of *flawed* reasoning...?"

LSATShinobi

Parallel questions can contain either a flawed argument or a valid argument whereas Parallel Flaw will always contain a flawed argument.

Cant Get Right

It kind of depends on which era of the test you’re in. On older tests, it could go either way if it’s left unspecified. On the modern test though, they always specify if there’s a flaw; and it is pretty safe to assume the argument is valid unless otherwise noted. Just be careful because that is just a trend and there’s nothing stopping them from giving you a flawed argument and not telling you.

That said, you really want to be so familiar with flaws that you recognize them when you see them. Don’t rely on the question stem. Rely on your knowledge of formal logic.

ThePaperChase

Thanks everyone!