I got this question right first but after BR when I just solved it with my logical intuition, but I got wrong since I made some logical diagram for the question.
Please clarify whether I had any error.
"Their new shows are all police dramas" : NS -> PD
(C) None of the shows that W&W produced last year that were not canceled were police dramas: /C(NSL) -> /PD = PD -> C(NSL) (It means every police drama that W&W created last year was cancelled
So if (C) is true, doesn't it help the premise (NS->PD) to create conclusion that most of new shows will be cancelled ( NS -m-> C) as it creates ( NS -> PD -> C(NSL) )? In other words, every police drama that W&W created last year was cancelled and new shows for this year is all police dramas, so it is highly likely most of new shows this year will be cancelled.
I think it would not be good to solve this question in this way but still logical appeal of (C) confuses me.
Please help me to understand it.
Thanks!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-76-section-2-question-25/
Comments