All Discussions
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Sign In with 7Sage
Register
Sign In with 7Sage
Sign In
Apply for Membership
Categories
All Discussions
Activity
Categories
33.5K
All Categories
28.1K
LSAT
17.1K
General
5.2K
Logical Reasoning
1.4K
Reading Comprehension
1.7K
Logic Games
70
Podcasts
191
Webinars
28
Newsletters
11
Scholarships
194
Test Center Reviews
2.2K
Study Groups
112
Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
2.5K
Specific LSAT Dates
35
November 2024 LSAT
18
October 2024 LSAT
9
September 2024 LSAT
38
August 2024 LSAT
28
June 2024 LSAT
4
April 2024 LSAT
11
February 2024 LSAT
22
January 2024 LSAT
38
November 2023 LSAT
43
October 2023 LSAT
14
September 2023 LSAT
38
August 2023 LSAT
27
June 2023 LSAT
30
Sage Advice
5K
Not LSAT
4K
Law School Admissions
13
Law School Explained
12
Bar
10
Forum Rules
641
Technical Problems
288
Off-topic
Related Discussions
About "without"
It's about to negate the sufficient condition, right? any example will be appreciated.
I have a general question about how you guys feel about the test
First of all, sorry I post so much, we are very slow at work during this time of the year. I spend all my time studying, on this form and on Reddit. …
Two very short questions about LSAT addendum / About Law schools App *Below both median)
Hi all!<br /> <br /> 1<br /> For LSAT addendum,<br /> I want to say at the end (in 3-4 sentences) that I will grow and discuss how I'd prepare in…
Nervous about the June LSAT on Monday?
Of course you are. You're about to take an important test. It's not the most important test though. That one you'll take in October (or December or n…
So, about that Writing Sample
Admin. Note (11/8/2019)<br /> Edited to add: Please see the following update by @"David.Busis" (also in Comments)<br /> "Hey everyone—I can speak f…
About "without"
dennisgerrard
Member
December 2016
in
Logical Reasoning
1644 karma
It's about to negate the sufficient condition, right? any example will be appreciated.
Show Related Discussions
About "without"
It's about to negate the sufficient condition, right? any example will be appreciated.
dennisgerrard
December 2016
Logical Reasoning
I have a general question about how you guys feel about the test
First of all, sorry I post so much, we are very slow at work during this time of the year. I spend all my time studying, on this form and on Reddit. …
LSATcantwin
August 2017
Logical Reasoning
Two very short questions about LSAT addendum / About Law schools App *Below both median)
Hi all! 1 For LSAT addendum, I want to say at the end (in 3-4 sentences) that I will grow and discuss how I'd prepare in the 6-10 months leading…
Whatslsat
July 2021
Law School Admissions
Nervous about the June LSAT on Monday?
Of course you are. You're about to take an important test. It's not <em>the</em> most important test though. That one you'll take in October (or Dece…
J.Y. Ping
June 2013
General
So, about that Writing Sample
<strong>Admin. Note (11/8/2019) Edited to add: Please see the following update by @"David.Busis" (also in Comments) "Hey everyone—I can speak for @…
J.Y. Ping
June 2013
General
Comments
1 Like
tjphilbrick
Alum
Member
December 2016
174 karma
PT 61, Section 4, Problem 25. And yes it is negate sufficient.
Example Sentence: You can't have snow without cold temperatures = /Snow --------> Cold Temperatures.
Correct Interpretation: Snow ---------> Cold Temperatures (/Cold Temperatures ---------------> /Snow)
dennisgerrard
Member
December 2016
1644 karma
Great!!Thanks.
@tjphilbrick
MrSamIam
Inactive ⭐
December 2016
2086 karma
Correct. "Without" and "Unless" = chose either variable, make it the sufficient and negate it, and leave the other variable in it's non-negated form and make it the necessary condition.
Sign In
or
Register
to comment.
Comments
Example Sentence: You can't have snow without cold temperatures = /Snow --------> Cold Temperatures.
Correct Interpretation: Snow ---------> Cold Temperatures (/Cold Temperatures ---------------> /Snow)