Hey, everyone. In my quest to become an LSAT test-taking machine, I made some digital flashcards to help me memorize some key concepts in LR:
--
Valid/Invalid argument forms--
Logical Fallacies--
Stimuli Indicators (premise/conclusion, sufficient/necessary, causation, some/most/all)
--
Question Stems--
Strategies by Question TypeI'm going to flip through these every day from now until the September test date until they can instantly be recalled from memory. And obviously, they're a compliment--not a substitute--for other forms of preparation. I thought I'd pass them along, just in case you find them useful, too.
If you like them, great!
If you don't like them, please tell me how you think they can be improved.
If you spot an error, please let me know.
If you have some great flashcards that help you memorize important LSAT info, please pass it along, too.
Thanks!
Comments
added to my Favorites. (:
Thank you!
Thanks!!!
Also for anyone interested, I made a quizlet for conditional indicators: https://quizlet.com/164108715/conditional-indicators-drill-flash-cards/
This is the truth! Thanks tremendously!
Announcing this in the Study Guides subforum.
This is awesome! Thanks @LetsHigh5. This community is fantastic.
this is great thank you so much!
These are amazing! Thank you so much!
*** UPDATE ***
I don't abandoned the "question stems" and "strategies by question type" linked in the original post. Instead, I combined the two AND updated the cards with improved strategies.
They're not perfect, of course, but it's definitely more efficient to study this one stack instead of the other two.
Also, as nice as the visuals of the "valid/invalid argument forms" cards in the original post are, I've since updated my thinking on this, too. It's simpler and for me, better. So, feel free to make your own strategy flashcard with this info. for "all"/"most"/"some" premises:
I hope that helps, everyone.
Please forgive the typos above, everyone. (Rest assured, I actually proofread my flashcards.) :-)
@LetsHigh5 Thanks a million!
This is correct! Thanks for the flash cards:)
Awesome resource, @sayhey180! I love that so many people here go the extra mile to share their wisdom and labors with each other.
Out of curiosity, how do you guys use these cards to study? While I love using flashcards for vocabulary, alarm bells go off in my brain at the thought of using flash cards for logic. I fear that even attempting to memorize those rules will stunt my ability to consistently and accurately derive them on my own. In not actually knowing these rules but being able to correctly arrive at them given any LR situation, I get unambiguous feedback and validation that I genuinely understand the logic, and have the skills necessary to pull such functions from a text. I don't want to gain a false sense of security by having the connections be automatic in most cases, only to feel unconditioned and blindly subservient when faced with an inevitable curveball.
But that's just my speculation as someone who hasn't tried it! Clearly a lot of people use these advantageously. I'd love to hear about how you guys use them so successfully!
THANK YOU!!! life saver bless you
THANK YOU SO MUCH @LetsHigh5 !!!!
(bump)
Just a reminder to those that just happened upon this post: the update I posted in the comments shows how I improved upon the original post.
@LetsHigh5 Thank you for these!!
I wish I knew this existed when I started studying. :'[
Bump!
The strategies for each question type is exactly what I've been looking for!! You sir/madame are a stand up citizen! Totally added all of these to my LSAT Folder on quizlet
Can someone please explain
"CIRCLE: all conditional, modal, and quantifier words."
what exactly are conditional, modal, and quantifier words or where I can be directed to learn exactly what those terms mean.
Thanks!
The Intro To Logic section of the CC explains all of these... its good, check it out.
-l.
Conditional Words: words that express a clause/causal relationship, i.e. when something occurs or when it does not (e.g. "if", "unless", "as long as", etc.)
Modal Words: words that express the likelihood of something occurring or not (e.g. "will", "probably", "can", etc.)
Quantifier Words: words that express the amounts/degree of something occurring (e.g. "all", "most", "some", etc.)
Yes, as stated by others, the 7Sage curriculum (or other LSAT resources) are where you'll go to learn these how these specific modifiers affect LSAT arguments.
And the reason it's so important to notice ANY and ALL of these conditional/modal/quantifier words is that the presence of even one of them in a stimulus or answer choice completely alters argument. In fact, throughout all LR and RC sections, the difference between a valid or invalid argument, or a correct or incorrect answer, will often hinge precisely on the presence of one of these types of words.
I hope that helps.
Much appreciated.