Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 33.4K All Categories
- 28K LSAT
- 17K General
- 5.2K Logical Reasoning
- 1.4K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 70 Podcasts
- 193 Webinars
- 12 Scholarships
- 194 Test Center Reviews
- 2.1K Study Groups
- 111 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.5K Specific LSAT Dates
- 26 November 2024 LSAT
- 18 October 2024 LSAT
- 9 September 2024 LSAT
- 38 August 2024 LSAT
- 28 June 2024 LSAT
- 4 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 22 January 2024 LSAT
- 37 November 2023 LSAT
- 43 October 2023 LSAT
- 14 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 5K Not LSAT
- 4K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 636 Technical Problems
- 285 Off-topic
Related Discussions
15 Likes
Important note about the December 2015 LSAT
Hey 7Sagers!
With the LSAT coming up this Saturday (Dec. 5th), I figured I'd reiterate our TOS and rules a bit.
We know that everyone will be excited to discuss what was on the December '15 LSAT, but mentioning specifics about the test (e.g., "Question 4 was odd" or "I got B for question 6" or "the 3rd LG was sequencing") can get both us and you in a lot of trouble with LSAC.
Saying that the test was hard/easy without going into detail is okay, but anything more specific is not okay. LSAC monitors this forum.
One exception is you can say which section was the experimental. For example, the LG with "flowers" was experimental. That's okay.
TL;DR: PLEASE don't talk specifics about December's LSAT!
Good luck everyone! Have a complimentary cute cat dog possum bunny hippo gif to knead wiggle gnaw binky stumble its way into your heart and melt your stress away.
With the LSAT coming up this Saturday (Dec. 5th), I figured I'd reiterate our TOS and rules a bit.
We know that everyone will be excited to discuss what was on the December '15 LSAT, but mentioning specifics about the test (e.g., "Question 4 was odd" or "I got B for question 6" or "the 3rd LG was sequencing") can get both us and you in a lot of trouble with LSAC.
Saying that the test was hard/easy without going into detail is okay, but anything more specific is not okay. LSAC monitors this forum.
One exception is you can say which section was the experimental. For example, the LG with "flowers" was experimental. That's okay.
TL;DR: PLEASE don't talk specifics about December's LSAT!
Good luck everyone! Have a complimentary cute cat dog possum bunny hippo gif to knead wiggle gnaw binky stumble its way into your heart and melt your stress away.
Comments