I recently got into a top 25 law school for Fall 2015 entering class, which is a good regional school. I also am a resident of that state, so I would get lower tuition.
I took the LSAT twice (1st score: 157, 2nd score: 161), but my practice tests had been around 165-167 range, and I was studying while working full time. I am not sure what my true potential is. I am wondering if it would make sense for me to try to retake the LSAT again this coming June, hoping for a score in the 170s, and then delay entering law school for another year so that I can get into a T10 school….OR just start going to school starting this Fall. Note that I’m 35 years old, and already having a professional career, so time isn’t really on my side. I'm trying to balance the advantages of cheaper tuition at a reasonable school, against the possibility of opening up more options by going to a higher ranking school, but waiting an extra year.
If it is worth it to consider retaking the June 2015 LSAT and waiting another year to enter law school, my follow up question would then be, how can I get a good personal assessment of my true potential score, with enough study and practice, and what score is worth retaking for?
Thanks in advance for you any advice!
Comments
I was in a position similar to yours last year... I'm turning 33 and I had a 163 on the Dec LSAT in 2013. the only schools I got into were U.C. Irvine ($$), Boston Univ ($), and Boston College. I decided to give the LSAT again, and after 4 points higher on the LSAT, I am planning on going to Georgetown. Had I decided to go to either of those schools, I would have gotten more money. I was actually in talks with one for more money. As far as what your score means...if you are doing it right, your actual score would be +/- 3 of what you are scoring...and if you keep on practicing right with BR, your PT (and actual LSAT) score WILL improve. You have a fair shot at breaking that magic 170 barrier.