Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

Categories

Help

Ortiz_44Ortiz_44 Member
in Study Guides/Cheat Sheets 90 karma

I've been racking my brain as to the best method to go about studying for he November 2018 test, and I know I want to go over the CC again, even if just a month, I already have it outlined and it will help me a lot, I'm sure. And then after that, I think I just need to start taking PT's. If I take two per week, and BR them, do 4 days of LSAT stuff, I should be able to get a decent score. I'm just rambling, but yea, help would be great. IDK, suggestions?

Show Related Discussions

Comments

  • btate87btate87 Alum Member
    788 karma

    I feel like I've gotten quite a bit out of this routine:

    PT's 50-59: Section/Day except on full PT Days, review the section right after, again the next day if it went badly
    PT's 60+ in this order: 65, 75, 66, 76

    I started on 65 so I have tests left to PT with if I retake in July/September.

  • Return On InferenceReturn On Inference Alum Member
    503 karma

    Definitely recommend going over the CC again if you're not BRing 175+.

    The CC is fantastic, and the concepts (when mastered) will enable you to answer any question the LSAT throws at you.

    I went through the CC twice, and I probably learned more my second way through.

  • FlashLSATFlashLSAT Alum Member
    293 karma

    @Ortiz_44 said:
    I've been racking my brain as to the best method to go about studying for he November 2018 test, and I know I want to go over the CC again, even if just a month, I already have it outlined and it will help me a lot, I'm sure. And then after that, I think I just need to start taking PT's. If I take two per week, and BR them, do 4 days of LSAT stuff, I should be able to get a decent score. I'm just rambling, but yea, help would be great. IDK, suggestions?

    when going over it the first time did you take notes?
    And I cant give any reason for not going over the curriculum again I could only see it being beneficial!

  • OhnoeshalpmeOhnoeshalpme Alum Member ⭐
    2531 karma

    @"Return On Inference" said:
    Definitely recommend going over the CC again if you're not BRing 175+.

    The CC is fantastic, and the concepts (when mastered) will enable you to answer any question the LSAT throws at you.

    I went through the CC twice, and I probably learned more my second way through.

    Going through the CC if you BR under 175 seems a bit extreme. 170 is probably more reasonable.

  • LSAT_WreckerLSAT_Wrecker Member ⭐
    4850 karma

    Usual disclaimer: Not an expert... However, since you've already done the CC once, might your time be better spent in PT / BR and then a targeted CC review of those areas that you are weakest in? For example, if your foundation in Logic Games is good and you could benefit by just doing more games / exposure / fool proofing, why use that time on LG CC review?

    I'm PT'ing in the upper 160's / BR'ing in the 170's and find that a return to specific CC sections is very useful; however, I don't think a complete review of the CC at this point would be the optimum use of my time. YMMV.

    Just another opinion. Either way, good luck.

Sign In or Register to comment.