Parallel Flaw

Comments

• 1 Like

  Leah M B Alum Member ⭐

  July 2018 edited July 2018 8392 karma

  The best way to go about it is to make sure you are really analyzing the stimulus thoroughly and know what the flaw is. Then, you have to analyze each of the answer choices for flaws. Once you spot a flaw, you have to make sure to check that it's the same flaw as in the stimulus.

  So these are the 3 categories the answer choices will fall into:
  1) Not flawed (wrong!)
  2) Flawed but a different type of flaw from the stimulus (wrong!)
  3) Same flaw as stimulus (bingo!)

  So, you more or less need to analyze each of the answer choices the same way you would any regular flaw question. You need to read each, identify the flaw (if there is one), and look for the answer choice with the same flaw as the stimulus.

  Let's say the stimulus is a flaw of too small of a sample size. The answer choices may look like this:

  A) Not flawed
  B ) Confusing necessary and sufficient
  C) Too small of sample size
  D) Not flawed
  E) Ad hominem attack

  So in this scenario, C would be correct. Parallel flaw is looking for the same flaw as in the stimulus, which in this case was too small of a sample size.

  Hope that helps!
• shegotit Member

  July 2018 edited July 2018 211 karma

  Yes that helps I think I was trying to do more of a pattern with the stimulus and answer choice and had no luck and then diagramming wasn't working all the time for me. Another thing that I have a problem with is the fact that the answer choices all seem very similar