It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
survive → beat them → you with meJon uses "need" to indicate necessity along with "if" to indicate sufficiency. Though he states only his major premise without giving the full argument, he correctly assumes that everyone wants to "survive" which would triggers the conditional chain allowing everyone to draw the conclusion that the Free Folk ought to stick with Jon Snow.
not willing to die for Jon → cowards → deserve to be last of the Free FolkLike Jon, Tormund also states only his major premise. He also correctly assumes that none of the Free Folk wants to be the last of the Free Folk nor do they want to be labeled cowards. Hence, by failing either of the necessary conditions, we can contrapose and arrive at the conclusion that the Free Folk "are willing to die for Jon". In context, this means join Jon in war to take back Winterfell from the Boltons.
Olenna: Cersei is 50% as smart as Cersei thinks she is → leaveScene 4 - Blackfish understands the inclusive or
Cersei: not leaving
Conclusion: Cersei's not very bright
not yield castle → nephew's throat cutBut I remember from this 7Sage lesson that if I yield the castle, that Frey idiot might cut my nephew's throat anyway. I'm gonna call him out on his shit bluff.
makes threats he's not prepared to carry out → foolSince Frey threatened Blackfish earlier but didn't carry it out, Jamie effectively called him a fool. There's the insult. But Jamie is also warning Frey because we can assume that Jamie does not think himself a fool and hence conclude that Jamie makes threats he is prepared to carry out. Jamie proceeds to make the following threat: "Now let's say I threatened to hit you unless you shut your mouth, but you kept talking. What do you think I'd do?"
not shut your dirty Frey mouth → Jamie hits youAnd of course, like the idiot he is, the Frey keeps talking.
don't want to take his place → bathe and feed himJamie assumes that the idiot Frey does not want to take the prisoner's place and therefore will bathe and feed him. This time they take Jamie's threat seriously.
Boltons hold Winterfell → North divided → no chance against Night KingDavos correctly assumes that Lady Lyanna Mormont wants to stand a chance against the Night King and so, contraposing back, will arrive at the conclusion that she should help them kick the Boltons out of Winterfell.
Comments
JKR--->SW!
If Reek drinks beer, he will be Theon Greyjoy!
RDB--->TG!
This thread has made my day XD !
tnx @"J.Y. Ping" for helping me to got my basic logic down
Great example of logic
Interesting!
I don't even watch GOT but this is hilarious!
Quick Question! With the Cersei v. Olenna scene, the logic confirms that Cersei is not half as smart as she thinks she is, but that doesn't necessarily preclude her being more than half as smart, does it? Just that she's not half or lower?
I think with this, we have to take the context of the phrase into mind. When someone says "You aren't half as smart as you think you are", they're meaning "You aren't EVEN as half as smart as you think you are." But if we're just looking at the words as they exist.. you could make that assumption that she just isn't half, and could be more or less, I suppose. My gut says that if you aren't half as smart, you can't be MORE than half as smart. Sorta like a glass of milk. You can't be over half if you don't even contain half. But my understanding of the context may be impacting my view.
Edit: My bad. The phrase was "If you are half as bright as you think you are".
@AudaciousRed Thank you!
I agree with @AudaciousRed.
Every time I read a stimulus on the LSAT, I try to adhere to the idea that I must take all the facts the LSAT provides at face value (i.e. outside of the context of the real world) and focus rather on the logical structure than the legitimacy of the facts irl. However, I'm not sure where idioms fall into this context. Are we supposed to interpret them literally? I know this is GOT so the LSAT might not rely on idioms as much, but in this case for example, we could assume that cersei could be more than half as bright as she thinks she is or less, the argument does not specify. But a reasonable person would assume that Olenna is not implying the former.
I try to think of it this way:
In LSAT logic, the negation of "hot" is not "cold" but "/hot"... similarly, I interpreted it as:
Olenna: Cersei is 50% as smart as Cersei thinks she is → leave
Cersei: /leaving
Conclusion: Cersei is /50% as smart as she thinks she is. (whether it is more or less, we do not know)
Am I thinking to much into this? #help
Olenna is insulting Cersei here so I think your interpretation is correct!
I'm sorry for being a complete nerd about this, but it's Jaime Lannister, not Jamie.
This upsets me because I don't watch this show and I wish I did, so I could understand this!
Im here a day after the show finale aired! Who else thinks John deserved better than what he got? Will there be an "Arya Sails West" spinoff? RIP to many
2 season later Lady Lyanna Mormont gets crushed by a Giant White Walker
I like the logic exercise, but I have not watched GOT.
Absolutely LOVE THIS!!!
Would love it EVEN MORE if there was an "e" in "bath and feed"...
son of a bitch, im in!
D&D are terrible writers. The GoT book content stopped after season 6. Therefore, Season 7 and 8 were terrible.
That's so logical. (Leaving this comment is to see what my tail that behind the nickname is, i am curious