I wouldn't say you "under performed", just tell them what the scores were for your SAT and ACT, with that GPA, it will show them that it was not predictive of success in your case. For the LSAT, if there is a good reason, you should explain the absence. But, if your reason is, I forgot, then maybe don't say anything.
Three valid scores in the same range and an absence would not require an LSAT addendum. I would caution against writing anything about a history of underperforming on standardized tests. The bar exam is a standardized test and admissions committees are looking to bar passage success when reviewing applications as well. Good luck!
Comments
I wouldn't say you "under performed", just tell them what the scores were for your SAT and ACT, with that GPA, it will show them that it was not predictive of success in your case. For the LSAT, if there is a good reason, you should explain the absence. But, if your reason is, I forgot, then maybe don't say anything.
Three valid scores in the same range and an absence would not require an LSAT addendum. I would caution against writing anything about a history of underperforming on standardized tests. The bar exam is a standardized test and admissions committees are looking to bar passage success when reviewing applications as well. Good luck!
In law school your entire grade will depend on a final. Saying you are bad at testing probably won't help you