Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

Categories

PT49.S4.Q16 - Extremely confused about when a statement is a conditional statement.I am confused about the logic translations seen in the video explanation for a particular LR question:<br /> **LSAT PrepTest 49, Section 4, Question…
can someone help me with clarifying the concept of "attacking a premise"Now I'm very confused about "attacking a premise"<br /> JY mentioned that LSAT weakening answer choices never provide plausible evidence that is inc…
Can someone give me a scenario of a flaw that looks like this?One that, "appeals to a premise one would accept only if one already accepted the truth of the conclusion." I know there is a circularity in it, but …
Can anyone help me to convert this sentence to conditional statement?Cakes that do not taste good do not contain the right amount of flour. <br /> <br /> Is it Cake not taste good--> /contain the right amount of f…
Can someone help me understand what is a blind reviewHere is what I know:<br /> 1. take a timed PT<br /> 2. while I am doing the timed PT, I circle the Q's I am uncertain of <br /> 3. check answers w…

Can someone help me clear a specific confusion about conditional statement inferences?

Harvey Spector Member

August 2020 in Logical Reasoning 105 karma

I know that
A --m--> B
A --m---> C
leads to an inference of B <--s--> C

So what inference does
A ----> B
A -----> C
lead to? Does it also lead to B <--s--> C?

Show Related Discussions

Comments

1 Like

miriaml7 Live Member

August 2020 1017 karma

You're correct! That's valid argument form #6
Harvey Spector Member

August 2020 105 karma

@miriaml7 thank you!!!
johnsherzod Member

August 2020 9 karma

A --> B
A --> C

should also lead to B <--s --> C

This can be found under Some and Most Relationships (Valid Argument Form #6)
nanabillan Member

August 2020 347 karma

yes!

or Register to comment.