It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Given the rule, "If G and S are both in, then W is in," I understand the contrapositive is "If W is out, then G is out or S is out (since both G and S cannot be in). But why doesn't the contrapositive also allow for the possibility that G and S are BOTH out (as well as W being out)?
Comments
It does allow for that possibility. It's just the difference between "inclusive or" vs "exclusive or".
this might help solidify your understanding of the word "or" on the lsat!
https://7sage.com/lesson/why-is-or-so-confusing/