So here's the thing. According to NYU's website, their 25% LSAT is a 167. I got a 166. I have slightly above a 4.0 in my undergrad major, however, for a particularly hard major, and I also have relevant international experience (I've been to Israel, Mexico twice, and Tanzania. While I was in Tanzania, I literally sat down and talked, through a translator, to a missionary who was a native Tanzanian but worked on Zanzibar, about how he'd been persecuted, such as literally having his house burnt down for his faith, while he was sleeping. Now I'm organizing charity boxing to fund raise for him. This is just one example.) Also, I am really involved in my community, working at the homeless shelters, mentoring youth, regularly preaching at my Church, and have a lot of leadership experience (In high school, for example, I received a character award that my football team gave in honor of a player who had died.)I also have some internship experience with the DA. Lastly, I can be very sincere in explaining why I want to go to NYU. They have such an intellectually cosmopolitan and stimulating atmosphere, the
#1 international law program in the country, and a number of intellectuals I really look up to who either teach there or lecture regularly (Peter K. Unger, Michael Walzer, etc.), and they also have the type of loan repayment where it's not unrealistic to work public or nonprofit sectors.
These are my weaknesses: I have a weak LSAT score, I don't know any foreign languages (and aspire to practice foreign law eventually, and specifically, criminal law in one of a couple developing nations), and I don't have any advantages going for me as far as legacy enrollment or affirmative action. Also, I need to figure out how to pay for this whole thing, and I didn't perform well enough to get any merit scholarships, at least as far as I know. Also, I have to work to pay for my school, so retaking the LSAT is a little unrealistic. That may make it sound like I'm disadvantaged, but I'm really not compared to a lot of people, and I'm not gonna sit here and go "well screw those people who get that money," cuz' honestly, a lot of people need it more than I do. I already know I probably don't qualify for any of that though.
Comments
First off I would like to congratulate you on getting a 166 and graduating with a 4.00+ gpa. My LSAC gpa is currently a 4.03, so I am in the same boat as you (in terms of gpa, that is). I would say that your chances are not good, but it doesn't hurt to apply. Also, some might suggest EDing to NYU, but I think that's a waste of an ED app because NYU doesn't give a large ED boost. You will most likely get into Georgetown, Cornell, Michigan, Berkeley (it's a strong possibility, provided you write a strong personal statement), UVA (an ED will do the trick) and a slight shot at Penn (which will be a better use of an ED app). Let me know if you have any further questions. I've spent hundreds of hours researching cycles for 4.00 applicants and, I must say, it really distinguishes you from the rest of the applicant pool. A 4.00 is not easy to come by for a school, so they have an incentive to accept you and raise their median. Let me know how your cycle goes.
International law is super hard to break into and while their program may be great, it seems easier to transition into the field from elsewhere. Many people seem to go the big law route, ask for work on their international stuff and then later on lateral out to somewhere more directly in the field. You definitely don't need NYU to do that and I'd definitely recommend researching the paths that people take to your desired outcome to better inform your choices.
For what it's worth I think the only place worth EDing (binding) is NU for the 50 grand a year. Everywhere else you're just throwing away your bargaining leverage.
@Pacifico
I do not think he should retake. Here's why. Let's say you take a year off, retake the exam, and get a $50k scholarship to NYU. While a scholarship of that amount is great you are actually losing money, that is, if you plan on going into Biglaw. You will sacrifice an annual salary of $160k plus a bonus, which usually ranges between $15k and $160K. So, while you might think you are saving money, you are really losing money.
Personally, I gave up the opportunity of obtaining a summer internship to focus solely on getting a good LSAT. I "lost" out on at least $8,000 of income, but I obtained a score that puts me in a great position for my dream school. I regret nothing.
And for what it's worth no first year associates are making close to a 160k bonus.
I know for a fact Wachtell's bonuses are AT LEAST 100% of an associate's base salary.
Susan Godfrey pays 1st year associate's around $100k if they bill a lot and produce high quality work.
Bodies Schiller pays top billers around $50k the first year.
I think you can rely on getting a Biglaw job if you go to a T14 (minus Georgetown). Over 65% (usually more) at most of the T14 schools get either a a Biglaw job or federal clerkship. Most of the other people don't want Biglaw. They want to do PI or get a corporate job.
Now that I know definitively that you want to do PI, my advice is completely different. Why not go to a school like Fordham with close to a full scholarship? Why would you pay sticker at a T14 if you plan on getting a lower-paying job that students at regional schools can get? I understand the T14 has prestige, but you are looking to do PI, not become a partner at Cravath.
It sounds like you do have good softs with your volunteering and international experience, so much so that you may be able to write a very compelling argument for yourself in your personal statement. But I would echo what @pacifico has said about retaking the LSAT and your overall application. Your goal is obviously to present the strongest application you can, and with the work that you have done in undergrad you are nearly there. I wouldn't let a weaker LSAT score (comparatively speaking, with your goal to get into NYU) derail your chances and take away the work you have done so far to put yourself in the enviable position of being a strong candidate for admission into one of the top law schools in the country. Even a 3 point increase would significantly improve your chances, which may only be the difference of 2 or 3 raw points on the exam. If you set your sights on the October exam you will still be able to apply early in the cycle, and you have just under 3 months to get in some quality studying around your work schedule.
Personally, I think the choice is fairly obvious that you should retake. You've already come so far so don't cut yourself short now! With a 4.0 undergrad GPA you've already demonstrated that you're disciplined enough to excel academically, so just apply some of that mojo to studying for a few more months before October!
I generally agree with this as well, though I could see how the T14 could provide him with a greater number of pathways to getting where he wants, and if he can couple a decent scholarship with loan forgiveness then it might just be a wash in the long run.
As far as NYU goes ... Man, oh man. Friend of mine (don't really give out many A's where I went to undergrad but this guy had a solid GPA) with a 174 graduated from NYU with close to $200k in debt. His big law job just means he can make his epic loan payments. Cool... I guess? Golden shackles for the fail.
So, uh, yeah. Retake if you feel you must go to NYU. Get as much scholarship money as possible. Please talk to a financial advisor before going into NYU-style debt if you're planning to do PI work. The numbers are a little scary. Don't forget cost of living in GV. And I hope you have a sense of the debt-to-income ratio you're going to be dealing with unless you get some very serious scholarship money.
... what???? How ... would that be losing money ... Do you seriously mean because these supposedly "in the bag" outlier incomes would be happening a year later? How is that a loss or even a sacrifice?
My theory is as follows: suppose he takes a year off and earns a score high enough to get a $50k scholarship. He will be losing out if he's planning on doing Biglaw, since he can allocate more than $50k a year towards repayment with a Biglaw salary (depending on the city in which he is living, obviously).
On another note, how did you guys find out your LSAC GPA? Can anyone direct me to where/how I can find mine?
Also, somebody mentioned Berkeley with a compelling personal statement. You are the perfect Berkeley candidate. Berkeley loves high GPA and doesn't emphasize the LSAT as much as other schools. Your LSAT is also within their range, albeit their lower range but still manageable.
TL;DR: retake and aim for the stars. work on your personal statement