It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I'm looking for an explanation to this question. I chose D (which is the wrong answer). Thx!!
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."
Comments
Starting off with the prompt I broke it down into three key pieces.
PS= Political stability
F = The fiction that laws are embodying the intention of the authors
I = illusion that laws are bequest of a long tradition rather than preferences of contemporary politicians
Reading the prompt we know that
The illusion is necessary for Politcal stability : PS -> I
and with know that The fiction is necessary for the illusion: I -> F
(they give this argument in a really obscured way but it essentially breaks down to this)
So we combined these two statements together and get:
PS -> I -> F
or the contrapositive
/F -> /I -> /PS
A ) incorrect, uses the term poltical leaders when it should be founders
B ) Correct: is essentially saying: when /F then/PS (/F -> /PS)
C) incorrect: Topic shifts with them stem being about intrepretation and use of the constitution while this answer choice is about beliefs
D) incorrect: has the wrong intpretation of F. This answer choice is saying is that a written consitution preserves the Illusion. But thats not what the prompt is saying. The prompt is saying "the Fiction that a consitution is being intrepretted in line with the authors intentions" is what preserves the illusion.
E) incorrect: off topic "perceived lack of legal tradition"?
Hopefully this helps
Cheers