PT70 Section 4 #13 Question

Comments

• DumbHollywoodActor Alum Inactive ⭐

  November 2015 edited November 2015 7468 karma

  Hope to see you at Group BR tomorrow. We're working on this exact PT.
  
  We don't need to have terms match the stimulus. We need to explain how both these disparate claims can exist together, in this case how the standards and centralization of planning and decision making created dramatic improvements during the industrial revolution and yet, later, by giving individuals greater freedom, they achieved greater productivity. That's it.
  
  B doesn't work because neither the increased productivity is not the the only benefit nor the job satisfaction increase explains how de-centralizing the decision making made companies further improve.
  
  E works because it provides the increased productivity a necessary condition: giving employee more influence creates innovation. Without that innovation, there's no increase in productivity. In this case the "highly" equates up pretty well with the stimulus's "already". That innovation explains the increased productivity..
  
  Hope this helps.
• keeper962 Member

  November 2015 edited November 2015 32 karma

  Thanks for the response I get it now:
  E solves the paradox of how something could be more productive without centralization (B doesn't do this while E shows that giving employees greater influence make more productive - Thanks for the help