Long story short: I took the LSAT 3 times. First time was a cancel>149>153. In all my PT's my range was 160-166, so to say that I am devastated with my score is an understatement. I know I am intelligent and I know that my actual LSAT scores aren't indicative of my abilities. My LSDAS GPA is 3.1 and regular GPA is 3.4 (switched majors from hard science to humanities). I have work experience in the legal field, good LORs, and a solid personal statement. My question is more about which direction to take moving forward. I can:
a) attend a sub-par law school and attempt to transfer to a top 30 after 1L.
b) retake the LSAT in December 2016, improve significantly, apply for 2017 admission.
c) apply for a bunch of reach/safe schools, if I don't get into any school I want, then wait it out a year and take the LSAT in Dec. 2016; reapply.
Any advice/input would be immensely appreciated.
Comments
>> DO NOT bank on transferring. You are banking on tremendous odds and you have no guarantees you'll have the grades at a subpar law school to even transfer in the first place.
b) retake the LSAT in December 2016, improve significantly, apply for 2017 admission.
>> This is your best course of action. Trust me, as someone who has been wanting to apply to law school since 2014, go when you are ready. Especially if you were PT'ing in the 160s, use this time to study incrementally and then retake at your next available date.
c) apply for a bunch of reach/safe schools, if I don't get into any school I want, then wait it out a year and take the LSAT in Dec. 2016; reapply.
>> This isn't a terrible idea but doesn't seem like a good use of your time. My guess is if you were aiming to apply to schools with your low to mid 160 LSAT, you'll have a really difficult time getting into those schools at this point in the cycle with your current LSAT scores. I would recommend doing something more productive with your time, whatever that may be.