Hey guys, so I am having trouble with logical reasoning. On every section at this point I get at least minus -10, more like 11 or 12. However when I BR I get them all correct, sometimes maybe 1 wrong. I'm just wondering what this means. It's very frustrating because when I BR I feel like I know the correct answer and don't understand why I didn't choose it the first time.. Does this mean it is more of a timing issue and I need to focus on recognizing correct answer choices more quickly? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Comments
A couple of questions that would be useful to answer:
How is your pacing for LR during a timed test? ("Slow and accurate in the beginning, then run out of time at the end and have to wildly guess on the last 10" would be a different issue from "rush through everything but end up using all my saved minutes on a couple of time sinkers"). If you can't remember, recording yourself on video as you do a section would help.
How many PT's have you taken?
How do you feel when you're taking PT's? Panicky? Frozen? Calm and sure you're doing great only to get a disappointing score?
Is there any pattern at all to the questions you're missing - certain type(s) of question, certain kind(s) of trap you fall into repeatedly, misread the stimulus, forgot it was an "EXCEPT" question etc.
Don't despair. Your BR scores show you have a good understanding of the logic, and there's a high chance that whatever's going wrong during the timed test it's something you can improve on with conscious practice.
Good luck!
My timing seems OK. I normally finish within the time limit. I do sometimes feel rushed at the end. I have only taken about 5 PT's as I have just recently finished the curriculum and am moving into PT's. When I'm taking them I feel pretty calm, not really panicky at all. Sadly there is not a pattern to the type of questions except that the majority of them are 4 or 5 star. I think I tend to get tripped up on the more complex ideas (like scientific arguments) even though I know thats not what really matters.
I am wondering if I should do about 10 sections of LR untimed to develop a more solid foundation and then head in again to PT's? It is just frustrating because I know I have the skills to get the correct answers. Thanks for all of your input!
I would advise against this since that’s what BR is for. Some part of your process is insufficient for a timed test. You need to figure out what that is. Taking PTs without time won’t tell you the information that you need to know. Collect data. I’d advise recording your PTs, note the times, and start categorizing questions. I’d also watch Corey’s Timing webinar to learn more about categorization. To get a 170+ score, you need to be able to answer a handful of questions in 30-50 seconds, so that you’ll have extra time on those questions that take 2:00-3:00. To be able to do that, you need to see the cookie-cutterness of certain questions (i.e. correlation-causation, necessary-sufficeincy, valid arguments, etc...) immediately. Once you start collecting data, you’ll have a much better idea of what you need to work on.
Best of luck.
I realize 5 PT's is really not a lot and am also wondering if it is something that will just work itself out over time as I progress and see what questions I am strongest/weakest in etc.
I am using POE on every question. Thanks for all of the help!
And actually, I think it’s ok that you didn’t do this for your first 5 PTs. You now know that you have a very good understanding of the content of the LSAT. Now, you have to get good at performing it. To analogize, you now know all of the notes of Bach’s Cello Suite no. 1, but you’ve still got a lot of work to do before Yo Yo Ma starts sweating.
You haven't taken a lot of PT's, so I suspect you're suffering from a combination of lack of confidence (which might waste you some time on easy questions where you should just know you're right and move on) and falling into attractive traps (the more difficult questions have the sexier traps, so that would be consistent with your pattern).
Pay extra attention to what makes your original answer wrong when you BR - there are a few tricks that the LSAT writers use over and over, like making a comparison when the stimulus didn't have one, talking about "all" when the stimulus says "some", "always" instead of "usually", "must" instead of "likely will", "cars" instead of "vehicles" and other such subtle but reliable indicators that an answer is wrong. Also make sure you pay attention to what the question is asking - if it's asking for a Necessary Assumption, one of the wrong answers might be a Sufficient (but not necessary) assumption.
Drilling some of the old sections should help you get some more practice with the LSAT trickery without eating into precious new material - whatever you do, don't use new PT's for drilling (PT39-77).
Keep us posted, I'm looking forward to seeing you progress past this obstacle. Like @"Can’t Get Right" said, an extra 15-20 correct answers would be huge!
edited to add - where are you on RC?