I've never been a fan of by-type drilling beyond learning the basics. The ability to recognize and quickly respond to the type is such a huge component of LG success, it has always seemed a bit counter productive to me to remove that from the study process. Not sure how the bundle was layer out, but that's my buck o' five anyway.
@"Cant Get Right" I agree with you there. And I think they can be useful if you isolate a problem during your PT/drill phase and have something to go back and drill. Otherwise, you are exactly right that quickly responding and recognizing different questions is imperative to the LSAT. I am forever and will always be a big proponent of drilling entire sections over drilling the packets past learning the basics.
I was just partly curious how they were laid out, and wanted to make my own and go through it to check it out. Otherwise, I have done most of the LGs from the Cambridge packets and am always fool proofing them to stay on top of things and get faster.
I'm just curious to know how they were laid out... Someone's gotta know, lol.
Comments
I was just partly curious how they were laid out, and wanted to make my own and go through it to check it out. Otherwise, I have done most of the LGs from the Cambridge packets and am always fool proofing them to stay on top of things and get faster.
I'm just curious to know how they were laid out... Someone's gotta know, lol.
LOL, I knew it. Haha much to ado about nothing.