I did som RC sections today untimed and it was like...around -10.
I'm sure I will make more mistakes if it is timed...
This is seriously my weakest section.
How to improve RC? I read some prep books, and they recommend to take notes, but not sure I have time to do so...
What kind of things are you doing for preparing for RC? Just read&do questions?
Thanks,
Comments
https://7sage.com/lsat-reading-comprehension-the-memory-method/
By the way,,,
Do you take notes? Or underline? How much notes do you usually take?
I thought maybe underline main topic in each para is good but when I tried it, it took too much time cuz I need to re-read the whole paragraph to find which part is importatn...
I would recommend The Trainer + 7Sage's RC lessons.
RC is hard to improve on, but it can be improved on until you are consistently at -0, just like every other section. I recently have begun the RC section of my prep (I think my diagnostic was -8) and through 7Sage, The LSAT Trainer, and tons of practice, I am slowing reaching my goal of getting a perfect RC score.
I think the above is a great piece of advice on how to get there.
A few big ideas that truly helped me besides the memory method and The LSAT Trainer's read for structure approach was not hanging onto every word. I actually began to read completely different than I do for other things.
I also realized that the answers are all in the passage. I now spend less time reading meticulously and give myself more time to go back and find answers and be sure. Even having an extra 20 seconds per question to do that is huge!
Lastly, by redoing passages, I have begun to truly develop a sixth sense about where the answers are hidden. I think I re-did about 20 passages and afterwards things began to click a little better.
Overall, keep in mind that RC is arguably the hardest and slowest thing to make improvements on. But if you keep at it you'll get better.
@"Alex Divine"
Can I ask how you changed the way you read?
So when we read a book normally we don't actively read. We just read page by page waiting for the author to develop a larger narrative and tell us a story.
When I read LSAT passages, I actively hunt out what the author is trying to tell me rather than reading along until they finally get to it. So it is basically reading for structure as opposed to the details.
I'm going to assume you already know all of this, but the integral part was actually training my brain to do it automatically. When I first attempted the above I was trying to juggle two idea in my head; read for structure and actually the ideas I was reading. Through practice now I do it a bit more natural.
Another way I have changed how I read for RC might not work for everyone, but it certainly was worked for me and that is also stopping the subvocalization of words as I read them.
It takes a bit of practice but it personally increased my reading speed quite a bit especially with science passages with obscure vocabulary that was often a bit foreign to me. My mind subconsciously would try to read the words as if I was going to have to pronounce them. Then I realized it didn't matter if I understood how to "read" or "say" the word. So I was able to stop getting hung up on words and re-reading sentences. I'm not sure if you have this problem, but it was a big one for me. So now when I run into a passage on antibiotics called Teliothromycintin, I won't spend 10 seconds re-reading it to try to understand how to pronounce it, haha. (This isn't an actual passage)
The 7Sage course nor the LSAT Trainer endorses the above advice on subvocalization. I know speed readers implement it as a technique to read faster, and arguably reading too fast is a bad thing for the RC, so just remain mindful of that if you try it. I just needed a way to stop getting stuck on re-reading oddball scientific terms, lol.
Thanks! Yeah, I have heard that before too and tried not to subvocalize, but then I found I actually do not understand what the author is talking about in the passage...my eyes are moving but I just cannot absorb the information.
Did this happen to you?
How did you overcome it?
Trying not to pronounce the science words sounds good, I'll definitely try to do that lol
Thinking back about it, yeah, I do think it was a bit odd at first not hearing the little voice in our heads saying the words as we read.
How did I overcome it? Just kept practicing and realizing and developing faith and eventually trust in myself that when we read words--whether or not we subvocalize them--we understand them. I think the reason I had the problem you mention originally was that I didn't think I was understanding the words if I didn't have that voice in my head.
Don't feel compelled to implement this into your RC strategy if it doesn't click. It is kind of against all credible RC orthodoxy. RC is very much the section where your own style and technique should be adopted and used. Find what works for you and go with it! I know people who got 170s who annotated a bunch and some who didn't make a mark. As a matter of fact, I think 7Sage endorses using subvocalization or I've heard reading the passage in the voice of Morgan Freeman. It might actually be you need to subvocalize more or differently if you're the type of person who this style is for.
Most importantly the changes I made with regard to my reading was hunting for things like the main point, tonal changes, and the normal questions they ask on RC questions. Also, I have made it a habit of finding "proof" in the passage to ensure I have chosen the correct answer. The answers are in there... I can't stress it enough. Never let even the more challenging RC passage scare you because you know the answers are in there. Hunt for them!
It's good to know we can actually stop subvocalizing and still solve RC questions...if I can do that, it would save a lot of time! I'll practice it
The single most important shift I made in my studies was buying most of JY's explanations for the PT's in the 70's. After watching JY read 10-15 passages and attack the questions, I've sort of developed his same confident and focused approach to RC.
Through his explanations, JY constantly reminded me that it's not the end of the world when you come across a passage where you have no clue what's going on. Just pull through and get the main idea of each paragraph and really try to understand the structure.
The thing is, I've heard that same thing said to me about a million times from a bunch of different sources, but I never really understood what it meant until recently.
All in all, I highly recommend listening to JY explain his interpretation of the passages up until you adopt the same sort of attack strategy that he has.
Do you mean...focusing on structure? So did you buy the individual explanations? I see you are starter, so the package does not include the explanations for 70s I guess?
I wish they sold only RC section explanations or something...
I'm thinking to get the starter too, but the explanations included is kind of old if I remember correctly...Does he explain in the same way as he does for 70s?
Thanks in advance!