Hi! I took the June 2013 LSAT and got a decent score but I know I can do better. I did the Kaplan online class, which didn't really help me all that much. I was wondering if this is different enough from Kaplan to help raise my score? I don't live close to any in-class options so I can only do online anyways. Any suggestions on other study material would be great! thanks!
Comments
Besides, who else uses Star Wars to explain formal logic? Nobody, that's who.
What I would like to add onto his explanation is that from my experience, I felt that 7sage focuses on your FUNDAMENTAL understanding of LSAT.
And this is crucial because this is what is required for you to deal with curve-breaker questions that will differentiate between you and the others.
Remember, LSAT is a standardized test.
So the more you get right on the questions that others get wrong, the higher your score will be.
Before I found 7sage, I took a course in Korea (what a waste of 1 month) that tried to teach LSAT in a purely formulaic manner, not just the logic itself, but the ENTIRE god damn thing.
The instructor would say something like "for weaken questions, find a new word that appears in the conclusion and look for an answer choice that contains this word."
And she would deliberately pick an example that complies with this "principle."
When I confronted her with an example that does not conform to this principle (which there are MANY), she would avoid giving me a direct answer and would say "well.. it works most of the times."
Then I would say, "why the f@#$ am I paying and investing my time into something that will only prepare me for 80% of the test?"
Hell, even I could teach it then.
After JY's lessons on weaken questions and the fantastic analogy of Goku and his energy-beam, I finally understand what my previous instructor meant by "looking for that new word."
It's basically this: when a new element suddenly is introduced in the conclusion, this indicates that the author has made a jump, and accordingly, an assumption.
And what do we know about an assumption? It's a weakness in the argument.
So of course the answer choice will contain this new element. DUH.
But LSAT writers are NOT stupid.
They will not give you such easy and formulaic questions such as 1+1=2.
There will be some questions that will truly test your knowledge of what an argument is, and when they throw these, you will need to have a comprehensive knowledge of what an argument is.
After 3 months with 7sage, there are very few questions that I just don't understand.
It's all about timing and concentration now!