I had LR RC LR LG LR. The first LR section was super tough and LR is my strongest section. I usually only miss 1-3 on an LR so it caught me off guard. I am pretty sure the 1st LR was experimental due to the question types. RC was easy compared to June 2016 and Sept 2016. I remember one on insider trading and African Americans moving up north. I didn't get to the 4th game cause game 3 was so tough.
@Toxoplasmosis said: Haven't waded through all the comments yet. But do any September takers feel this was substantially easier. That is my immediate takeaway
I think it was reasonable, with the exception of LG, which I though was relatively just as bad as september (PT 79). maybe worse.
@spotlight24 said: I had LR RC LR LG LR. The first LR section was super tough and LR is my strongest section. I usually only miss 1-3 on an LR so it caught me off guard. I am pretty sure the 1st LR was experimental due to the question types. RC was easy compared to June 2016 and Sept 2016. I remember one on insider trading and African Americans moving up north. I didn't get to the 4th game cause game 3 was so tough.
My thoughts exactly. I really really hope that was experimental
@spotlight24 said: I had LR RC LR LG LR. The first LR section was super tough and LR is my strongest section. I usually only miss 1-3 on an LR so it caught me off guard. I am pretty sure the 1st LR was experimental due to the question types. RC was easy compared to June 2016 and Sept 2016. I remember one on insider trading and African Americans moving up north. I didn't get to the 4th game cause game 3 was so tough.
do you remember any of the questions from your first LR???
I was LR-RC-LR-LG-LR. I don't remember any of the questions.. does anybody who had my pattern know which LR of the three (1st, 2nd, or 3rd) was experimental?
I had 3 LR sections and one of them was brutally difficult. It had question about a shipment of stawberries on Friday being bad on Sunday. Anyone confirm or deny this section is experimental?
Was the RC passage about eating raw foods and evolution of digestive tract experimental? That section was my 2nd RC and I found it all harder than my first RC. I thought 3rd and 4th LG games were incredibly hard. Couldn't grasp an approach for the buildings game. I thought the virus game was piece of cake in comparison!
@rachel said: Was the RC passage about eating raw foods and evolution of digestive tract experimental? That section was my 2nd RC and I found it all harder than my first RC
I think so--I only had one RC and that was not part of it!
I am expecting a drastic increase in my RC score from September. It was extremely easy. LR will remain the same. But LG real estate was easy (I am a broker), the painting was confusing, chapters in a book was challenging, but I worked through it. But what was the other game?
@esteerose said: I had a super easy experimental LG section, so I was all psyched....until I got to my last section (the REAL LG section) and had to guess most of the last two games (trading buildings and watercolors). Is there any way they'll curve it? Take some questions out? Why the hell was that so hard??
LG is my best section. I usually get -2, or -3 wrong. I think I got about half of these wrong.
omg so i'm not the only one who felt this way.... i froze so early on and it makes no sense because i'm usually decent at LG. i didn't get to the last game at all so i guessed on all of them. i panicked hard on this LG section and it was not experimental cause it was my only logic games section.
I thought that this test was easier than September. A couple of hard RC questions, but overall not too bad. LG wasn't too bad unless I totally missed or misinterpreted an inference/rule..... I actually preferred the trading game to the computer virus one. I had three LR and there were a few hard questions there, but nothing out of the ordinary. Crossing my fingers.
I had 3 LR sections and one of them was brutally difficult. It had a main conc question about a shipment of stawberries on Friday being bad on Sunday. Anyone confirm or deny this section is experimental?
I also had 3 LR sections but this was not on mine.
I had 2 sections with 25 questions of LR. But 3 sections overall. The first one seemed really tough, had a bunch of main conclusion questions and like 3-4 agree/disagrees. I'm making an assumption that was experimental.
@stgl1230 said: I thought that this test was easier than September. A couple of hard RC questions, but overall not too bad. LG wasn't too bad unless I totally missed or misinterpreted an inference/rule..... I actually preferred the trading game to the computer virus one. I had three LR and there were a few hard questions there, but nothing out of the ordinary. Crossing my fingers.
I agree the trading games was much easier than the computer virus. I feel like my score improved from September because the RC was so easy.
@workhardplayhard said: LG killed me - okay not literally because I am typing this. Was the insider trading and the north-south migration a real RC or experimental?
@"Dylan Taylor" said: I had 2 sections with 25 questions of LR. But 3 sections overall. The first one seemed really tough, had a bunch of main conclusion questions and like 3-4 agree/disagrees. I'm making an assumption that was experimental.
I completely forgot most of the LR questions that I had but now that i read your comment, I think this is the one I had. The only other thing I remember from the first LR section was that there was a weird MC question about virtues or something like that.
Comments
Yes, I think so.
-Touching Something Blue and Red
-What Year a Book was Written based on it Asking Where He Was
I also got two LR's, and don't remember touching blue and red on either.