Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

Identify premise, context and conclusions in Most strongly support questions?Is it necessary to identify premise, context and conclusions in Most strongly support questions? So far I don't and have done well.
Parallel Flaw and Parallel Reasoning questionsHey everyone, <br /> <br /> My LSAT analytics are showing me that my Parallel Flaw and Parallel Reasoning questions are of the highest priority. I'…
Great in Str Questions. Bad in Weaking QuestionsSo i'm going through the LR practice questions and I get about every Strength question right. But, I do awful in the weaking questions. And I know bo…
Will an answer choice in Assumption Questions ever repeat the conclusion or a premise?I suppose the title is self-explanatory, but I ran across a question in particular (LSAT 58, Section 4, Question 21) regarding lottery winners and te…
Parallel Method of Reasoning and Parallel Flaw StrategyHey guys. During timed prep tests, I take a long time to answer PR and PF questions and I only get them right 20% - 40% of the time. Even with this i…

Identify premise and conclusion in parallel reasoning questions?

mzoodle Member

August 2017 in Logical Reasoning 226 karma

Thoughts?

Show Related Discussions

Comments

LSATcantwin Alum Member Sage ⭐

August 2017 13286 karma

It's essential. I don't know what else to say lol
TheMikey Alum Member

August 2017 4196 karma

yes you should be doing that.

identify each piece of the stimulus, not just the premise and conclusion though
1 Like

Jonathan Wang Yearly Sage ⭐

August 2017 6869 karma

How can you answer a question about a piece of reasoning if you don't know what's being claimed and why?
1 Like

Alex Alum Member ⭐

August 2017 23929 karma

I feel like it's the thing that is absolutely necessary to reliable get these questions right...

or Register to comment.